At Ask-a-Geologist,
we see a disproportionate number of “What’s this rock” questions. Often they
are accompanied by a blurry photo, and we find ourselves trying to explain the
sometimes complicated path we must follow to identify a rock ourselves. The
following query is a bit different – and not just because it had no photo
attached. I hope the answer will help encourage readers to remake themselves
into amateur scientists. The fact that the question was asked in the first
place is encouraging to me - because no questions asked means nothing learned.
As an aside, several
fields of science have discovered that they can make a huge progress by
engaging interested amateurs in their research programs. Classifying galaxies,
folding proteins, and tracking bird species are just some of these. Some of the greatest science of the 19th and 20th Centuries was done by amateur scientists; Einstein was a patent clerk when he published Special Relativity in 1905.
Q: I have a rock. I
think it's a meteorite. Where can I take it to have it tested? I am in San
Bernardino, CA.
Thank you,
Nancy B.
A: Some background first,
so you can better understand what you might have in your hand.
Meteorites are not
commonly found lying on the ground. They are found disproportionately in the
Antarctic and in snow-covered areas. As you might instinctively expect, they
fall in equal numbers everywhere on the planet. However, in Antarctica they
impact ice and snow, and do not get mixed in and confused with Earth rocks. The
ice and snow in Antarctica become glaciers, carrying their meteorite
collections along like a conveyor belt. The glaciers tend to sublimate
(evaporate) near their lead edges - where the meteorites accumulate.
Consequently, dark rocks falling out of white ice are concentrated, easy to
see, and have not been mixed in with Earth rocks. For slightly different
reasons (among other things, there is no conveyor belt concentrating mechanism), the Sahara and the Empty Quarter
of Saudi Arabia are also places where meteorites are more readily found – they
stand out sharply in the white-to-beige sand dunes and flat lag-gravel plains.
Almost all meteorites
break up in the upper to middle atmosphere of the Earth, and the fragments that don't burn up
generally fall to the ground at their terminal velocities in air. This is typically
greater than 200 km/hour on average, and they have punched through cars and houses in the past. Some exceptions to the atmospheric breakup rule include the nickel-iron
asteroid fragments, which can easily make it through the Earth’s powerfully protective
atmospheric blanket. With the Wabar object that I once mapped in the Empty
Quarter of Saudi Arabia, we calculated the mass (from crater diameters) to be
about 3,500 tons at impact. Compositionally, it was fairly uniformly 94% iron,
5% nickel, and the rest was cobalt, copper, and iridium (a so-called “sidereal”
element not normally found on the Earth’s surface). “Irons” represents only
about 2% of the stuff floating around in the Asteroid Belt (most of which are
stony or chondrite objects). However, iron meteorites represents about 5% of
the meteorites found on Earth. Why the higher percentage? Because blackened
metal is far more easily identified when picked up than an ablated (burned-looking)
rock that falls among other similar-looking Earth rocks.
Meteorites
are notoriously difficult to identify - in large
part because there are sooooo many rocks that could easily be mistaken for a
meteorite. As a rough approximation, probably less than 1 object in 10,000 that
people THINK could be a meteorite actually turns out to BE a meteorite.
Moreover, most professional geologists don't know how to distinguish a meteorite
from a look-alike... This is because most geologists have never seen a meteorite
(they are rare), except for a few under-representative examples in a museum
somewhere. In other words, they have never been able to handle and examine a
meteorite like the rocks they examine in the field areas where they are
commonly working. To put things in perspective, there are far more gemologists
than real meteorite specialists in the world.
I
wish I could help you myself, but I do not consider myself a meteorite
specialist. Moreover, the US Geological Survey is not funded by Congress to
study meteorites - we have very specific tasks that we are assigned to do, such
as monitor volcanoes or carry out mineral resource assessments (like me).
Consequently, any studies outside of these assigned tasks we must do on our own
time - because we find the subject interesting.
In
my case, for instance, I was drawn into the meteorite field almost accidentally
when I visited and mapped the Wabar meteorite impact site a number of years
ago. Accompanying me on one of our three trips was one of the foremost meteorite
impact specialists in the world at the time, Gene Shoemaker (the “Father of
Astrogeology”), and he provided a massive data-dump of his experience for me. Many
of the few "real" meteorite specialists that I have personally known
in or outside the US Geological Survey are now either dead (Gene tragically
died in a vehicle accident in Australia) or retired. One transferred to NASA,
because he couldn't do what he wanted most to do (study meteorites) in the USGS.
There are meteorite specialists in the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, but both
NASA headquarters and the Smithsonian are on the opposite sides of the continent
from you. There are a few meteorite specialists at the Lunar and Planetary Lab
at the University of Arizona in Tucson, and there are individuals who are
competent to assess meteorites in the Astrogeology science center of the US
Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Arizona, among others.
All
THAT said, how DO you identify the sample you have? I will offer you two lines
of approach, but both require that you expend significant efforts to learn
more. In essence, both require you to teach yourself to become an amateur meteorite
scientist:
1.
Easier Path: Search the internet for books
on, and photo examples of, meteorites. Look closely at any that show texture
(for instance tectites have a distinctive texture but are not technically
meteorites). Keep in mind that there are quite a number of different types of meteorites,
from Stony to Chondrite to Nickel-Iron, to rare Pallasites and Nakhlites, as
well as others. This list, by the way, is in increasing order of how rare they
are. First become familiar with the possibilities, then when you see one that
looks like your sample, search for other examples of that type. ESPECIALLY
search for detailed descriptions of that kind of sample. Buy or borrow a
hand-lens (a reasonably good one will cost ~$35), and see if you can see any of
these characteristics in your sample. I have seen a few reasonably good
self-help guides for identifying rocks - choose one, and then spend some time in the
first part of the book learning rock-identifying principles.
2.
Harder Path: This is more difficult, requiring
you to make more than one cold contact; it also requires you to do some significant homework up front. You could contact the geology
department in a university close to you. Look for the largest university that
you are willing to drive to, because you will have the best chance to find a
true meteorite specialist there. Contact the geology department first to make
sure you are not wasting your drive. THEN see if you can arrange to meet the
geologist there who indicates that she or he feels confident enough to identify
a meteorite. Keep in mind that these people have paid work they must do (such
as teaching), and may not want to take the time to help. Also, geology
departments are commonly inundated with people showing up and asking "what
is this rock?"... so it will require patience on their part and on yours
to make a connection.
Warning:
One thing I would not recommend is sending a photo of the sample. No competent
geologist would be willing to identify a rock from a photo alone (even if it
was high-resolution, taken with a macro lens, and was crisply focused). The
reason for this: to identify a rock, a geologist must be able to handle it,
turn it over in sunlight looking at texture and constituent minerals, scratch
mineral grains with a knife, crack the rock open to examine a fresh unweathered
surface, examine it minutely with a hand-lens, etc. In most cases, a photo
conveys less than 10% of the information needed to identify a rock. In many
cases, even these techniques leave the identification unresolved, and
thin-sections have to be cut and examined in a polarizing microscope, or a
chemical analysis must be done, or both, to get a definitive answer.
Like most things of value, this won't be an easy thing for you. However, you will become a smarter and wiser person if you study this subject. Then you could go beyond that and become an amateur (meteorite, or anything else) scientist.
~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment